Why choose Test Flows AI

    If your goal is stable UI automation at high coverage, you need a workflow that’s fast to create and cheap to maintain. That’s where most traditional approaches break down.

    Speed

    Record flows, refine them in a timeline, and scale coverage faster than writing scripts from scratch.

    Maintenance reduction

    Self-healing locator strategies reduce brittleness so UI changes don’t constantly break your suite.

    Reliability

    Fewer false failures means teams trust results and run automation more often.

    Cost efficiency

    Improve coverage without hiring a large automation team or committing to heavy enterprise contracts.

    Comparison: common approaches

    ApproachWhat it’s good atWhere it struggles
    Selenium-style frameworksMaximum flexibility for engineersSlow to write, fragile selectors, high maintenance
    Script-heavy record/playbackQuick demos and simple happy pathsBreaks under real apps, hard to keep stable at scale
    Enterprise platformsCentralized management and governanceCost, complexity, slower iteration cycles
    Test Flows AIFast creation + maintainability + stabilityBest results when you standardize flows and validations